Comments on: “Faster” Serialization

By: Uwe Schaefer

Uwe Schaefer — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:37:36 +0000

i´ll post another article about it. see /blog/2009/09/amf-serialization-followup-faster-serialization/

By: Uwe Schaefer

Uwe Schaefer — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:37:48 +0000

thanks!

By: cornel creanga

cornel creanga — Sat, 05 Sep 2009 08:03:06 +0000

Take a look here: http://cornelcreanga.com/docs/testprotocols.zip
You will find an Intellij project – it has the required libs+sample code how to use the AMF3 serialization

By: Uwe Schaefer

Uwe Schaefer — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:26:22 +0000

Thanks. i´ll try the AMF3 serialization lateron and post back, promised.
Where to get the minimal code to use AMF3 serialization? i don´t have to grab the whole 170mb BlazeDS source, do i?

By: cornel creanga

cornel creanga — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:04:48 +0000

I think there is a bug in the hessian serialization algorithm, in your case it’s not able to detect that the objects from the lists are identical. However I’ve tried also AMF3 and is faster that plain java serialization, maybe it worth to give it a try.

By: Uwe Schaefer

Uwe Schaefer — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:48:26 +0000

Update: tested Hessian:

JBossSerializer: 1344ms (Size: 849289 bytes)
HessianSerializer: 1140ms (Size: 1239018 bytes)
PlainSerializer: 985ms (Size: 699312 bytes)
PlainGZipSerializer: 1328ms (Size: 306680 bytes)

not only plain is faster, but it also is significantly more compact.

By: Uwe Schaefer

Uwe Schaefer — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:42:12 +0000

nice. i´m gonna try hessian and post back. thanks.

By: Ilja Pavkovic

Ilja Pavkovic — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:24:49 +0000

perhaps you want to look at this one:

http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/07/java-serialization-versus-amfhessian-serialization/