<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InnoDB checks UNIQUE and FOREIGN KEY constraints row-by-row</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesmell.org/blog/2009/06/innodb-checks-unique-and-foreign-key-constraints-row-by-row/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesmell.org/blog/2009/06/innodb-checks-unique-and-foreign-key-constraints-row-by-row/</link>
	<description>another useless blog, virtually noone is going to read....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Pachod</title>
		<link>http://www.codesmell.org/blog/2009/06/innodb-checks-unique-and-foreign-key-constraints-row-by-row/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Pachod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesmell.org/blog/?p=2603#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Some new update : in fact foreign key constraint seems to be planned at mysql level in some future release of mysql 6 (see http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?133,149493,149493#msg-149493 for more details).

Not too bad in the end, just have to wait &amp; see !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some new update : in fact foreign key constraint seems to be planned at mysql level in some future release of mysql 6 (see <a href="http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?133,149493,149493#msg-149493" rel="nofollow">http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?133,149493,149493#msg-149493</a> for more details).</p>
<p>Not too bad in the end, just have to wait &#038; see !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.codesmell.org/blog/2009/06/innodb-checks-unique-and-foreign-key-constraints-row-by-row/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesmell.org/blog/?p=2603#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Good question I was willing to look investigate later on.

Looking at it quickly, it appears that Falcon doesn&#039;t support foreign keys (cf http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/6.0/en/se-falcon-features.html). 

Then its syntax looks like not having unique constraints definition possible (cf http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/6.0/en/se-falcon-createtable.html).

Nice transactional engine isn&#039;t it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question I was willing to look investigate later on.</p>
<p>Looking at it quickly, it appears that Falcon doesn&#8217;t support foreign keys (cf <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/6.0/en/se-falcon-features.html)" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/6.0/en/se-falcon-features.html)</a>. </p>
<p>Then its syntax looks like not having unique constraints definition possible (cf <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/6.0/en/se-falcon-createtable.html)" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/6.0/en/se-falcon-createtable.html)</a>.</p>
<p>Nice transactional engine isn&#8217;t it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uwe Schaefer</title>
		<link>http://www.codesmell.org/blog/2009/06/innodb-checks-unique-and-foreign-key-constraints-row-by-row/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Uwe Schaefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesmell.org/blog/?p=2603#comment-22</guid>
		<description>does this change with Falcon, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this change with Falcon, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

